data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5739/c573982aa322551478586567d7f3f80acbc96fbe" alt=""
The bottom line? "From the cost-benefit analysis, it has been found that family planning (considered purely as a method of reducing future CO2 emissions) is more cost-effective than most low-carbon technologies."
While the report focuses mainly on carbon emissions, the same investment in contraception will have similar benefits in other areas including desertification, deforestation, species extinction not to mention air, sea and soil pollution.
0 Comment:
Post a Comment
thanks for comments, criticisms, and suggestions